the enemy of the people
(the views expressed here are not necessarily those of the publisher.)
a very slow painstaking process that cannot be rushed,
how to be an artist is a related tract, and being an artist is humanizing indeed, but it is also animalizing, mineralizing, energizing, and nullifying, which altogether comprise humanizing but only if kept in careful balance. In truth, even artists cannot find the balance and be fully human unless the culture they reflect is fully human, so everybody needs to take this course and start at level one like everybody else, as the tower of fully human humanity demands different foundations from that of proto- or post-humanity.
Scholars, I've noticed, do not have perfect focus, they can be quite visually impaired even with all their refined magnifying instruments. One should definitely steal these instruments and use them, but remember that scholars looking through the first microscopes saw verification of the fully formed homunculus implanted in the womb at conception. The microscope could not prevent them from seeing what they already believed until some renegade took over the instrument and beat them over the head enough times with what was right before their eyes.
Today, the key proto-humanized critic advises proto-humanized artists to toss out the whole apparatus of scholarly inquiry -- they only see what they want to see anyway -- ignoring the fact that if used with a truly open mind, this constantly self-correcting scholarly apparatus augments our understanding of history and therefore the present and future dramatically, and it is very unwise to let it rust along with obsolete electronic equipment in a heap of toxic waste if you don't want dangerous viruses spreading. For instance, when aforesaid critic dismisses scholarly reference to the origins of perspective in the Renaissance, he has not read enough to understand that they mean something much different from the mere mechanical technique described by Vitruvius used theatrically, the modern version spectacularly initiating "the age of the world picture". It's like he's obviating the capacity of art to take on -- and solve! -- the largest philosophical problems of the day, those problems underlying all the surface problems, political and otherwise.
you do need to stop and reflect, and that's really all that scholars do, and it is quite special even if it can get very off track and out of touch with the world. and the world can get infected with strange deviations from its original purpose.
But you do need an internally cooperating scholarly apparatus to err and correct and err and correct to understand the very important implications and concatenations, because an understanding of the underlying conditions veering a microscopic degree from the truth of the matter over time will open up a chasm, and the ship of state will one day be utterly lost in the night, and one can only hope it kept good historical records so it can retrace its course to where it first made that microscopic, minimal mistake.
Which is what I decided to do, possible because of the careful historical records. Noticing the ship was lost in the night, carefully studying the logs and the back ups, I retraced our course back to where we first veered that minimal degree. For a while it seemed were still heading back to the garden, but now have given up on that and are just trying to survive the night on sheer faith in the will to survive of the species, as if nature had any issue with extinctions;
but take heart, hang in! I've studied where it began in order to correct the deviation, and after conferring with the crew and explaining everything carefully so they're ready to comply, getting the captain to call COME ABOUT! and if he won't call it, the crew and I will be ready to cry MUTINY!
it amazes me that people spend decades learning and working on how to be a transcendentally objective machine, but won't even take the months or years it takes to learn from the first and greatest humanist -- Giotto -- how to be a human being at his level, where I hope to verify, having decoded his language, anything lower is really post-humanist, a euphemism -- don't blame the messenger, just absorb the logic, it's the logic not me that wants to knock you off your horse in a blinding flash of light -- for sub-human.
you see, when people work so hard to think things through and understand, as if they really wished to, one must hope they really do wish to, because if they keep at it, one day there will ensue a tsunami of understanding, too gigantic and multi-dimensional for science to fathom, but for art it's pretty much a piece of cake, but not just any cake, a long making, baking and perfected cake that, as historians have intricately documented, emerged alongside, or actually inside the cake of emergent science, equally long gestating and perfected, but took seven centuries to bake, and then the timer went off in my head as I had sniffed out the cake and found the kitchen.
let's try that again:
when people work so hard to think things through and understand, as if they really wished to, one must hope they really do wish to, because if they keep at it, one day there will ensue a tsunami of understanding, too gigantic and multi-dimensional for science to fathom, but for art it's pretty much a piece of cake, but not just any cake, a long making, baking and perfected cake that, as historians have intricately documented, emerged alongside, or actually inside the cake of emergent science, equally long gestating and perfected, but took seven centuries to bake, and then the timer went off in my head as I had sniffed out the cake and found the kitchen.
and once more:
when people work so hard to think things through and understand, as if they really wished to, one must hope they really do wish to, because if they keep at it, one day there will ensue a tsunami of understanding, too gigantic and multi-dimensional for science to fathom, but for art it's pretty much a piece of cake, but not just any cake, a long making, baking and perfected cake that, as historians have intricately documented, emerged alongside, or actually inside the cake of emergent science, equally long gestating and perfected, but took seven centuries to bake, and then the timer went off in my head as I had sniffed out the cake and found the kitchen.
(Now you please do it yourself -- I mean read each paragraph thrice. The journey is not only a thing to savor -- if you don't love going there, if you get there, you're never going to stay there, so you may as well not begin-- and savoring it is, in this case, the only way to get there. It's an exercise in civilized biting of bite sized sounds for us hounds of society slurping up bowls and with our tongues out imploring more more more! It's very difficult to master radical humanistically modulated reading, as it must not only go down slow, but there's some flavor there that you can't quite identify, and you're dying to get to the bottom of it, the effect is that of common salt applied to something crunchy, such that you simply can't stop until you get to the bottom of the bag, but the bag seems bottomless and finally you just get exhausted and decide to stay away from this bag of potato chips forever. For me to ask you to use restraint with these potato chips compares to asking an alcoholic to have glass of wine and leave it at that. Compared to post-humanist slurping of bowls and bowls of sound bites, or even proto-humanist dishes that slow you down somewhat, it will feel like I'm trying almost to starve you, as if you were a novice in the convent of Teresa of Avila! But as with the novice, I promise, once you get the hang of it, this radical moderation is ecstasy!)
To continue (tomorrow, no more potato chips allowed today, sorry, whoa! okay okay one more maybe, but you do have to do your part for this training to work.
I immediately began distributing the aforementioned cake, and the hounds of society tasting it cried -- wow, this is amazing! I've never tasted anything like this! -- but then reached for their spittoons and spit it out; they could not swallow, let alone digest it. and if anyone asked them what had happened the night of my reading -- they ranged from twenty minutes to five hours -- they would say, the performance was great! but in no way be able to describe or summarize it, and they'd already forgotten all about it.
I believe -- though there is no physical, brightly colored, readily marketable object involved to keep pulsing out the always brand new news turning this enterprise into a respectable one -- something is happening similar to what happens with my late mate's quite simple and minimal paintings generally of two biomorphic blobs on a warped stretcher, which a critic noted are so present and anomalous that he often cannot remember them, because he cannot find anything to compare them to, there is no hook. They're just out there. But in fact, they're also hooked up to everything, and they hook everything up to everything else, and I've explained this very carefully, but people can't swallow or digest even the hors d'oeuvres, which you can find on his Instagram page; I'm very proud of a post describing the conspiracy of Johns and Ron, allowing the latter to give rebirth to the world, to link everything back up, as living religion (religament) in both a visually and verbally communicable way, not just be amazing to look at.
You see, I had bedded up with Giotto, the seven-century dead white chef responsible for the aforementioned cake, and then I found his bones in my bed. That's how synchronistically Jung at heart the I am and how hooky it gets when you play hooky from everything pre-digested, and demand to taste, swallow, and digest ambrosia. Isn't it time, you big baby birds, to digest your own food? I understand you've delayed because grown ups with wings demand ambrosia. I understand you've been waiting for the ambrosia, which you are not going to accept as such without careful inspection of the seeds, farm, and the kitchen throughout the process, as a responsible noble who has inherited this estate. Welcome to the kitchen!
Critical thought pinpoints a problem- then boomerangs over to embrace what opposes it to cancel out the problem, but this cancellation is never directly accomplished. Rather, the problem uses this resistance like gym equipment to build up its muscles, even if it goes underground for a while to surprise the resistance gloating over its victory. Still, with all the regressions speeding on any progress made, the wheel of history inches forward, however something's lost with every gain, still, I'll take the gains.
But then again, we don't seem to progress fast enough to overcome the problems evolving to outwit our ability to solve them, and what's lost is substantial; moreover often the problem has not been scrutinized sufficiently when the decision is made to resist it with a counter-attack, that, to speak its language, itself is insufficiently scrutinized. Often what is needed is contextualization and visualization revealing that head and tail are not enemies needing to chase each other around in circles, but different parts of the same puppy dog.
Therefore, if a chance opens up here for a catastrophic leap out of this minimally progressive reaction-ary system, I call on critics to brave, following whatever gestation period is needed, a dramatic rebirth, a conversion from progressive reaction-aries to creatives -- as Martin Luther King says, everyone must be an artist -- similar to when the painter Philip Guston, in fear and trembling, one foot forward, one foot back, then with a leap, shocked himself and all his friends and the whole history of art and culture, at great personal professional risk, by allowing his abstract paintings to follow their outrageously rebellious impulse to evolve into grotesque, sublime, ridiculous, monumental representational self-portraits.
Abstraction is in fact a reaction-ary progressive practice, attempting to restore primal experience and resist the banality of reproducible, generic words and images, whose gains it helps to consolidate in the short term, but it pushes the wheel along in the great circle, heading back to the garden. Though I used Guston's personal crisis and courage as a model for the integrity required to evolve, and try to impress on everybody the fact that we are all obliged to imitatio Guston, his radical change of style itself does not break or transcend the progressive reaction-ary cycle or stand outside of it. It's just the captain's sudden cry to come about, to tack to the resigned conservative side, let's make the best of the degraded world we have, fact the music and dance, after the tack to radically iconoclastic left -- let's shatter all the idols and begin again -- that keeps the craft heading forward on the straight and narrow. The art is just mirroring and being mirrored by the new critical tack playing pingpong with a spotlighted ping pong ball, as the slow slow train moves on. And you feel it in the darkness and jailhouse humor in Guston's work that high modernistic-ally says, no exit, except by shattering the idol of the world, been there, done that, so now trying this.
A visionary approach does not negate this reaction-ary teleologically progressive -- thesis antithesis thesis antithesis...effort and start another pingpong game; it simply attaches a jet engine to the craft so it cuts through the waves and heads straight to the target -- synthesis -- not a new thesis to begin a new pingpong game, but a revelation of the timeless single path that falls in and out of view. It is in no way reaction-ary, it is autonomously creative, wholly positive generated from an original positive desire to be and go forth toward not requitement but fulfillment of all desire. A lack that's been resigned to is reconcieved a hope for the lacked, as when a sperm penetrates a hole, from safely negational -- though it can get you in trouble and takes no small effort to do it well, to criticize is a lot easier than finding a solution, so critics as such who put themselves on the level of, or even often above, creative artists, including computer programmers, chefs, gardeners, and philosophically explosive writing performance artists (ahem ahem), but not "artists" who are just playing around, should stop it -- to bravely, riskily posit-itional -- the ayes have it -- and puts the creative artist worthy of the name in command -- and so do the eyes. The artist, always a junk collector, finds a place and use even for the dregs, the outdated teleological process itself, grown decadent and narrowing into an ever more involuted vortex -- wait Jerry Saltz, don't toss it out, I can use it!. I have lifted off from Flatlands and entered a three-dimensional world in which all that is happening can be affirmed and rearranged to a surprisingly, indeed shockingly positive effect.
And I propose that you have all the faculties to turn on the light right this minute too; the only thing stopping anybody, however unconsciously, is the market. There's no market for it in a society that worships, not the other guy, but mammon. In this society and all who are invested in it, unmarketable illumination is an enemy of the people. Nevertheless, I persist, like Guston carrying the weight of the world on my shoulders, but he can call himself Don Quixote, and he and everybody can call me deluded, but the fact is, I am a real knight, like worthy Sir Elton John, who came to see that his destiny lay beyond the yellow brick road -- and the proof is in the way the meaning melts into a melody as green as fertile farmland, but in America nothing is allowed to lie beyond the yellow brick road. There's no real knowledge behind a diploma, no real love behind a locket, no real courage behind a medal, just having these idolatrous fetishes confers enough confidence sufficiently to simulate the effect, so the wizard can escape and Dorothy can awaken from that fun for a while, but getting very old nightmare, but by then the farm is sold, and the nightmare reigns from shore to shining shore. I'd move to Europe, but there's no place like home. And who cares if I'm not publicly knighted. I'm a knight, that's good enough for me. Plus everybody who crosses the threshold into my apartment knows it's not America.
To return to the birth of science wrapped up in art, since then they grew apart though always very friendly. But art and its history became a separate language, an entirely separate body of knowledge, and then both science and art lost touch with their shared roots, as well as too much interest in their roots. They saw themselves as free, as two friendly tumbleweeds, but is that really their nature? Are they not more noble beings, such as great flowering, fruit bearing trees, which, having emerged from sister seeds, are among those arboreal sisters that feed each other's roots and grow so to depend on one another, if one dies so does the other? Isn't this tumbleweed idea just a midsummer night's dream or flight to Oz from which it's high time to awaken? Try to remember, George Washington, as your snow shoes made of thicker and thicker ice crystals dyed red from your bleeding feet scrape against each other and you stumble forward, your gaze riveted on that distant cabin with the fire glowing from the hearth, and repeat after me-- there's no place like home, there's no place like home... .
I am an artist, but I feel my roots so entwined with those of science, I often forget myself and can't tell which of us is which -- I being the first to be crushed by the tsunami of understanding, the first one to stir and feel the present, though to call a human being ever woke is, with all due respect, a joke -- at best we hover between, intermittently present, as on the first pages of A la Recherche du Temps Perdu, the rememberer of the state awake enough to identify it from a distance, but not so woke that he forgets how it feels, which would be to fall sound asleep again, a typical victim of some grand illusion watching the news that's dead on arrival, like a twinkling star that burned out eons ago.
Oh this dreamily present one thought she was a clever girl, giving up her social world to gain three masters degrees pawing at the ground to claw away and dump elsewhere all the irrelevant material that covered what she'd caught a scent of in her doggy artist way, a bone she finally found there in the form of a hunch about how to bridge the breach without violation of the autonomy of each, and it will take some maneuvering by the editor to loud protests from those who arrived on time and have been patiently awaiting their turn to speak to move me up in the line in time to avert disaster.
It's a bit -- or more than a bit -- hard to get used to, with the chasm long deemed too wide and deep for even an Evel Knievel like me to attempt one jump, let alone the oscillating exchange supplying this electric current, but my finding of the lynch pin reveals that art, or at least one work of art fully realized in a breakthrough interpretation using and advancing state of the art methods revealing this long missing link to be science's original twin sister, conceived in the same transition from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance, from feudalism to capitalism, sacred to dawning secular culture to evolve into fully formed science contained in its own space in the baroque era and flowering today -- very vulnerable cut off from its roots before essential re-grafting in the nick of time -- this original work of art as an autonomous entity is, in fact, just geometric or visual science -- after science piles up and classifies all the pieces of the puzzle according to the categories most useful and likely to produce matches, then finds some continuity across a few different categories, these assemblages suggesting further pockets of unprecedented coherence, the artist with the camel's back breaking straw suddenly sees it and begins moving the pieces all around in every direction to assemble the image.
(I personally believe that science and any being's life begins at conception, and you may as well call a fetus a baby like people do naturally -- they don't say -- ohhh the fetus is kicking! -- but whose responsibility it is at various stages before the umbilical cord is cut might be subject to debate; in any case the state of science, art, my conscience, or anything doesn't have to order me to protect, nourish, and suffer the bloody birth of etc. this contribution I'm making to both science and art that every part of me from id to ego to superego, torn between those two lovers, science and art and convinced of their dangerous viral status apart from being wound up in this complex molecule, wanted to make all my life.)
As the puzzle pieces break free of their piles or drag them over to the other side to assemble the image, scientists and science lovers cry -- huh wuh, what's going on, this is total chaos! -- stop messing up my categories! and the other artists mingling with scientists at the root, join in There is no image! The image is dead! but then one and then another glimpses it, and cry -- It's there! I see it! and, when everybody had given up hope and least expected it, a reborn modernized classical age, a visual age ruled by an ultra-efficient visual order inundating the world with instantaneous understanding that runs words ragged flying through metaphors trying to focus it and keep it in sight -- please spare me Renaissance philosophy!.. but it's connected to very astute, scholastic theology, father of modern philosophy! -- has dawned full of hope and promise.
Some people will hang on to the past and never acknowledge it, because you can't prove the existence of music, only of notes, or that of an image versus dots, and so much effort has been made to deny the existence of the former, song turning into talk, portraiture into dot transfer. But is it really safer and wiser to consider music non-existent until its existence can be verified in a court of law? But wait, if now you think you can file me on your side in the music or just notes debate, you've got me wrong. My button holes are two small for your sticky fingers. My music dotes on the notes, my notes are music unto themselves. My fetal condition both a baby and not a baby, however it frays the wires of your digital brain and it starts singing Daisy in slower and slower motion -- hello human!! -- it's simply not either/or.
And think of the wonder of it, you are here, on a day, today, that is not like other days, when something fell into your inbox that is not like other things there, requesting that you to study it carefully -- the best way is to keep breathing and relax and enjoy, even thrill to its thrillingness as I drillingly boringly drip and bore into the core -- and when it occurs to you what's hitting you, dare I suggest you dare to support it before everybody, to no credit of their own, jumps on the bandwagon for all the wrong reasons, already casting a shadow over its radiant face.
*****
Giotto paints what the eye cannot see. (Boccaccio)
The ignorant cannot understand him. (Petrarch)
(so if ignorant about Giotto, Dante,
the birth of autonomous art, the modern world,
and related literature and issues,
check out the internet, get educated,
and come back in four years. Well okay,
those who wish to sit in and try to pick up something, fine,
but don't grumble, what the hell is she talking about?
Relax, just let the meaningless words wash over you,
and a miracle could happen,
as when the crowds from foreign lands
all understood the apostle as if he were speaking in their language.
Those concerned with white privilege
may scroll down to the paragraph
that I believe will satisfy you on this matter.
welcome nobles
(ladies and gentlemen worthy of the name)
before we begin,
now that you're up to date on the literature
and your shoulders here unburdened of chips
in some ways more painful than whips --
as if your oppressors had already won --
f-k that sh-t! --
please allow me to tell you
what has never before been told,
the true story of art in a nutshell,
or
How to Be a Human Being
It's harrowingly humbling and divinely inspiring,
it's everywhere and utterly elusive,
it's an insult to every other hobby horse
until that hobby horse
enters its most hobby horsey harem,
and with this manual I discovered,
even I can do it, so whomsoever it's eluded,
so can you! and being human
means aspiring to humanity, never a done deal.
what a boon to find a manual
to keep everybody on track.
without further adieu
How to Be a Human Being
you see, art said --
I do not privilege science
I do not privilege humanities.
I do not privilege manual labor.
I do not privilege intellectual labor.
I do not privilege giving.
I do not privilege taking.
I do not privilege good.
I do not privilege evil.
I do not privilege hope.
I do not privilege despair.
then art said,
I privilege myself!
and began moving to occupy
the Animal Farm manager's office,
so sad,
as the stars had just then arranged themselves
to re-reveal as such the perfect work of art,
not decoration or propaganda,
and not not that, not anything
but art the thing apart,
born in a night to perish in a night,
with everything else failing better and better
closer to the summit or worse and worse
closer to the base, all failures great and necessary!
the worst forming the essential, wide, stable base --
so artists, just proudly let your art,
however badly failed it's good,
take its natural place, the whining babies
constantly flagging in autonomous inspiration
languishing in a lower rank than hoped for
should study the manual,
How to Be an Artist
and not give up,
even when all hope for promotion is lost,
forget their wounded pride,
and just celebrate the chance to play and serve.
taking pride in their necessary role,
even those sent to the front lines
to be certainly felled in the first round.
(It's also the critic's responsibility
to position and keep re-positioning everybody
properly and maintain mobility
until the perfect place for each is found,
and not overdo such encouragement as would
suggest all equally deserve
fifteen minutes of world wide fame,
that was a joke.
Interpretation of art is an art,
as with a musical interpretation.
The conflation of the critic's role with that of the interpreter,
while sometimes producing beautiful interpretations,
is dangerous, because when close enough,
that seems to close the book
before hitting the jackpot.
A thousand words is not a fair price
to pay for a picture.
A picture is worth a tome
or a solid gold poem worth a picture.
Thou shalt not steal.)
in order to revive and sustain
this wonderful happening,
the equally perfect realization
of each and all of the opening exclamations,
denying all categorical privilege as far as
to stop on a dime before that denial becomes categorical,
as later transpired (the righteous iconoclastic imperative
becoming the most stifling category of all),
the apex -- nel mezzo del cammin di nostra vita --
of all that it omnisciently remembers
and clairvoyantly foresees, the mountain
whose upward slopes converge on it.
It's said that nothing white men
made or found isn't sullied by their evil deeds,
I won't argue that general point here, for or against,
but only say that if so,
it will leave some trace in the sullied thing,
and also an exception is needed to prove the rule.
Without here examining other possibilities,
I will show decisively that this work is un-marred,
having apparently paid the fair price demanded,
purified, it purifies and releases a laughing gas
of repentance, inexplicable, incalculable mercy,
forgiveness, and healing grace,
clearing the ground for purely positive production
for the good of all,
all for whom justice suffices,
all who grasp that delight in surplus revenge
is a soul devouring serpent,
and on the other side, all should recognize
the need for such an outside aid, and not expect
a spontaneously measured approach
after immeasurable abuse.
Consider that slavery existed everywhere
of whites by whites and blacks by blacks as well,
of words by things and things by words,
but this great artist, a lowly shepherd discovered drawing a sheep,
and almost as ugly as the elephant man, wound through the world
untouched by the world to make a real world
where slavery even of things by words
or words by things -- the source of all the other kinds --
disappears forever,
but so far everybody in the real world
has found some excuse not to get near there,
however every path naturally crosses it,
everybody always goes out of his or her way
to get around it and manages too, uncannily,
before having the least inkling
that it could and does exist,
as if their life's journey's
had been pre-planned
centered around this concerted evasion,
just as mine pre-planned to evade
and expose the evasion.
Perhaps we are but puppets of the gods,
or drives, as science now teaches.
At least it looks to me like the gods,
like Jane Austen, Alfred Hitchcock, or me as a housekeeper,
just create all the messes to enjoy how good it feels
to clean them up.
In the classical paragone,
the competition between poetry and painting
revived at the dawn of the Renaissance,
or actually the blue hour,
privileging neither the night nor the day,
the past nor the future,
by its meta-non-categorical imperative,
when art ascended to the summit here invoked,
the reticent tortoise of painting, such a hard nut to crack
most think one must wait for death, or the split second before,
however it's all right there right before the eyes,
had fallen behind the relatively self-explanatory hare of poetry
with whom it kept pace briefly at the outset,
but the hare on a tare had relatively burned out,
and the peripatetic dome all alone had crawled up
to crown the summit with a tortoise shell army helmet,
not, in fact, describing the moment of death or its aftermath,
which the artist alone was privileged to visit,
as did the poet trying, he had to admit, in vain
to recreate the image, as in reverence for it
and for his painter friend, he jabbed at the fickle public
(often construed as a jab at painting itself,
but the poet's and painter's was the friendliest competition,
always cheering each other's elegant moves,
only concerned that the game itself win)
I say the poet in defense of, construed as an attempt
to undermine his friend, jabbed at the public
for scanning like machines unable to recognize
a traffic light in a mildly ambiguous context,
only responding to the latest eye catching arrangements,
forms, and colors swiftly going out of style.
Alas even if they had been able to see not just scan it,
all the spectators had gone home
by the time the little walking dome crawled up to the summit,
revealing painting's long held blueprint for heaven on earth,
blowing away the clouds to reveal the North Star
so the ship of state and the state of art -- wheeee! --
could stop spinning in the wind,
but art like everybody essentially,
by that time, as now,
when the stars reconvene to re-reveal it,
was busy worshipping itself
and its own position and supporters
and its own hour, unlike the perfectly realized art
of the golden ages wrought by them
and the likes of that pair
now babbling and playing chess
by a babbling brook in the Elysian Fields,
and it was like the son of god
came (some say came back)
and couldn't even get people
to pay enough attention to crucify him.
Some also say,
in response to the dearth of historical records --
Bulgarov propounded a related theory
in The Master and Marguerita --
that that's what happened the first time,
and the small band of disciples
who had recognized him,
in pity for him
and in excessively decent, but rather foolish hope
for the humanity of humanity,
decided to describe the minimally
more human response
that had been hoped for,
so that the messiah's purpose
could be fulfilled.
If that were the case,
would it really be so bad
if art, the little artlessly artful white lie
with a higher purpose,
managed to save the world
and the humanity of humanity?
I think most believers and moderate skeptics
would be okay with it,
but some grand inquisitors, from orthodox to atheist,
though they burn perfectly pious saints for heresy,
actually hold to the Manichean heresy
that Creation, with its wiley methods,
its pretexts, ruses, and camouflages, is an evil web
(and I'm not sure how they think
they can unravel it scientifically
when they also worship the empirical evidence
it conjures up with its nefarious, convoluted methods),
would dig in their heels, so I'm afraid
this won't right away end the struggle
between humanity and the machine,
but how many for how long can oppose
this alliance of art faith and logic
for a legalistic fine point
demanding certainty at every turn
when the ground on which we stand
is irrevocably uncertain,
and we humans are sailers at sea?
so that's it,
how to be a human,
please study it carefully,
there are many fine points,
and within the fine points
you'll find finer and finer points,
it's heady up here close to the summit,
where the more you turn and look
the more you see forever.
as the following Talmudic commentary
attests, winding round and round and round
with the writer explaining and clarifying the thing
in more and more detail, but maybe it's really
just getting more opaque, as any certainty
regarding the ultimate nature
of humanity's divine humanity
certainly eludes even the highest angel in heaven
sitting at the right hand of the uncertain god,
a voice within calling from a place
where nothing else can ever stand,
but why do I bother? if the starry night
never shattered you, unraveled all your explanations,
and forced you down on your knees,
the machine must have body snatched you at birth,
the very now uncontrollable machine
whose accelerating speed in quest of certainty
the verified uncertainty principle,
lost in the mountains of data,
does not in the least deter,
as it tears, conductor-less, faster and faster
over the countryside to its doom -- Zola zapped it!
oh lost modern world.
Veronika! Veronika! your all too human traits
will be your undoing! Despair, impatience,
and hysterical hyperbole,
however fitting to the hyperbolic situation,
will not accomplish the ends you seek.
Modern man is irrevocably in love with ME.
You're right, I'm sorry. Thank you machine.
I'd be lost without you.
Clicking on the wink to humans
will not prove you're a human, reader,
just that you have potential and are still ahead of the machine.
Both aspiring humans and machines
may now proceed to the next level.
an everything but your self help program
that might in the end help you because everybody saw Jerry Maguire, or now will be sure to, and would never align with THEM
complete technical version linked just below -- available, given the pressing spiritual crisis, until the present version oriented more to the laymen is completed.
underlying premises to be elaborated in upcoming work --
solving the world's problems depends on constructing somewhat complex machines of thought that are in fact at least much less complex than long philosophical tomes meant to prove unprovable theses,
and the former actually can solve the world's problems.
just as viewing atoms molecules and cells enables us to cure disease -- revealing the underlying forces and ideas that rule Creation in a transparent mimesis -- an imitation of Creation perfectly transparent to its own process -- has the same effect re. social problems that arise in ignorance of the common constituents of all experience.
the act of creation alone understands creation
again the following is the technical "proof" that on reflection and studied application can be translated into the above mentioned results
ARE YOU READY? FOR THE MOST BORING PENETRATING BOOK EVER WRITTEN!!! (SCHOLARS, WHO LOVE BORING BOOKS BECAUSE THEY LIKE TO PENETRATE THINGS, BIND WITH THEM, AND CREATE MORE THINGS, WILL TAKE SOME INTEREST UNTIL IT STARTS ERODING THE GROUND UNDER THEIR FEET)
CLICK ON
>>>>>>>> giottopage1.blogspot.com <<<<<<<<<<<
IF YOU --
EVERYBODY EQUALLY FEELS THIS IS NOT THEIR DEPARTMENT -- NOT JUST DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT IS AN ARRIVEMENT THAT NOBODY IS READY FOR, BUT WHAT EDUCATED PERSON BESIDES ME WOULDN'T RATHER PAY TO HAVE AMAZON ASSEMBLE THE WASHING MACHINE? --
I SAY IF YOU CAN ROUSE YOURSELF AND STAY AWAKE IN THIS POPPY FIELD, YOU STAND A CHANCE TO SING GOOD-BYE YELLOW BRICK ROAD, WORLD, OTHERWISE DREAM ON, KNOWING -- JUST LOOK AROUND -- YOU'VE NOT YET MELTED THE WICKED WITCH, AND OZ IS FUN FOR A COUPLE OF HOURS, BUT DOROTHY STUCK THERE IN A GROWN UP BODY FOR MONTHS ALMOST DIED OF EXHAUSTION AND HAD TO GET HERSELF TO REHAB OR DIE. IF YOU'VE BEEN THROUGH IT ALL AND THINK YOUR PERSONAL DESTINY CATAPULTED YOU BEYOND, DID YOU FORGET THAT YOU ARE THE WHOLE WORLD, OR YOU ARE JUST A MUNCHKIN.
Trusting that the truth however delayed and resisted will eventually prevail, I can only tell it as it is, that IF, big if, you don't just read it, ugh, but think about it -- what? you've got to be kidding, I'm too busy to read it, let alone think about it -- this finding turns the inside out world right side in. It awakens us from a midsummer nights dream in which alien species wed, from a zany trip over the rainbow where the yellow brick road never ends, and the dogs of society never stop howling. The dream was fun, but has grown old. This finding finds the way back to the plough and the hunt for the horny black toad. This finding grounds language in matter, so that language can lift matter up within its capacities. This finding lies at the source of all inspiration, all songs that are not made of snippets of other songs, but songs that flow on one, totally surprising uninterrupted strain straight from the virgin source.
![]() |
the rose-ary that arose on a pile of hurricane blown dust covering the bones of Callisto, my she wolf guide on the first stretch of this odyssey, Callisto's Garden, May, 2019 |
![]() |
studio of the moi mole, 2016 |